Australia's dominance in women's cricket is no fluke

The way the women’s game has developed in the country is a lesson for the rest of the world

Ian Chappell09-Apr-2022The highly successful Australian women’s cricket team has rightly joined an elite group of winning sides. In recent times that group includes the Australian men’s team from around 1999 to the mid-2000s and the West Indies side of the eighties through to the mid-nineties. Both those teams achieved lengthy success and dominated their sport.The Australia women’s team, brilliantly led by Meg Lanning, has put together an incredible run of 40 victories in 42 ODIs since dramatically losing the 2017 World Cup semi-final to India.Australia capped their skilful performance in this year’s tournament by clinching a spectacular 71-run victory in the final. They set England an enormous chase by scoring 356 batting first. This exceptional tally – almost equalling the men who made 359 in the 2003 World Cup final – was anchored by Alyssa Healy’s scintillating knock of 170.Related

  • Bangladesh, Ireland added to 2022-25 Women's Championship; no India vs Pakistan series slotted

  • Big-match beast? Nah, just 'brave', and that'll do fine for Alyssa Healy

  • Australia's formula for world domination

  • Team of the Tournament: Lots of Aussies – what did you expect?

Healy is a famous Australian cricket name but she is only one of a number of star players. The team’s ongoing success has been built around Lanning’s strong leadership, bolstered by the individual brilliance of many.Healy’s slickness with the gloves is not surprising because she has inherited the keeping skills of her uncle Ian. However, when she bats, it’s a different story. Where Ian was highly competitive but slightly unorthodox with the bat, Alyssa is a fleet-footed stroke-maker. She uses her feet to get into position and then guides the shot in her preferred direction with subtle use of the wrists. When I chatted with Healy and her father, Greg, over a beer, I realised she also has inherited the cheeky Healy character.She scored a record-breaking 170 in the final and she also provided a substantial platform for Australia’s semi-final win, with a century. Producing big scores in crucial games is a sure way to underline your importance in the team.Lanning is a high-achieving leader who maintains her standing with continual success.The thing that strikes you about her batting is her technique. Not only is it built on traditional lines, it also provides her with ample time to play her chosen shot. Her technique is as good as most.The other aspect is her ability to produce match-defining scores at crucial times. This was again highlighted during the World Cup, with her 135 not out after Australia lost an early wicket in the vital round game against South Africa.Lanning now has ten centuries in winning ODI chases. That kind of successful consistency will help cement any leader’s position.In addition to her batting ability, she has been a good and studious leader. Her captaincy has evolved and she handles a capable but varied attack and injury setbacks comfortably.The improved depth and quality of the squad will be pleasing to her. Australia’s dominance is no fluke. The demanding nature of the competitions Australia play, from inter-state series to the highly competitive WBBL, and the way salary escalation has been implemented, are lessons to all concerned.The improvement in women’s cricket is obvious from the enormous increase in team totals. While the rapid improvement is visible in Australia’s dominance, the increase in scoring rates – improved by nearly two runs per over in three decades – has been apparent throughout the women’s game.The other area where rapid development has been made is fielding. Not only is the ground work much improved but the standard of catching and throwing has risen quickly. The BCCI is now recognising the value of developing the women’s game and intends to hold an expanded IPL competition soon.Along with these rapid improvements has come increased prize money and greater attendance, as indicated by the near capacity crowd at the MCG for the 2020 women’s standalone T20 final.Other teams now need to raise their standard to meet the demanding challenge set by Australia. This will be a tough assignment, especially while the strong-minded Lanning is in charge.

Tabraiz Shamsi: 'I've always wanted to get the best guy in the opposition out'

The South Africa spinner talks about relishing the chance to go up against England, his prolific 2021, and finding his feet in the national side

Interview by Matt Roller14-Jul-2022
Tabraiz Shamsi has become South Africa’s premier white-ball spinner in the last three years and one of the world’s most prolific bowlers in T20Is: only Wanindu Hasaranga took as many wickets in the format in 2021. Shamsi speaks about his ambitions for the white-ball series against England, his use of analysis, and his trademark celebrations.Did you get the chance to spend some time at home after the tour to India?
It’s nice to be here in England – the weather’s good for a change! We had about ten days at home after the India series. I feel refreshed – about as much as you can, as much as is possible. You always want more time at home, but at least we got something – other guys don’t even get that much. The way the calendar has changed nowadays, you finish a series and the same night you’re off to the airport. That’s what happened for us when we played India. It’s quite refreshing to get to a country and have two warm-up games – that’s unheard of.Related

  • Van der Dussen ton condemns Ben Stokes to farewell defeat as SA spinners turn screw

  • Is South Africa's outlook on spin changing?

  • 'I didn't know fatherhood was this hard – it's non-stop'

  • 'I was on the sidelines for three years, so now that I have the chance I want to take it'

You’ve played England a few times before and they’ve come hard at you. Are you looking forward to the challenge?
Just for the record, it’s not only against me: they come hard against everyone! I enjoy that because it gives me opportunities to try and pick up more wickets, compared to someone that’s trying to be conservative. There’ll be some days where you’re going to go home sad, but others where you go home very happy. That plays into the way I like to bowl. As a player who believes in himself and a team who believes in themselves, you want to play against the stronger teams; you want to test yourself against a team like England.England will pick a full-strength batting line-up. What goes through your mind when you see the names on their team sheet before a game?
From a young age, that’s something that’s always excited me. Whether it was schools cricket or provincial and first-class cricket, I’ve always wanted to get the best guy out on the opposition team. England is blessed with many good guys, so that’s really exciting for me. It’s something I’m proud of when I play: it’s a great opportunity to be bowling against very good players and having an opportunity to get them out.

“Skill-wise, some guys are slightly better than others, but I don’t think the difference is as big as it is mentally. That’s what makes great players great: their mental approach to the game “

You took 36 T20I wickets last year, the joint most in the world along with Wanindu Hasaranga. Was it the best year of your international career?
I had always been in and out. Obviously Immy [Imran Tahir] was around and he was the man in charge – rightfully so – but I basically feel that my international career started after 2019. Before that, I would play one game, then another one three months later, then another one after two months. You can’t get any rhythm. Now, you play on Wednesday and if you make a mistake, you can try and correct that on Friday. You see what works, what doesn’t, and then you play again on Sunday. That’s the only way I think a player can improve: if he’s backed and he’s given enough opportunity. I always believed in my abilities but to be able to get that run to actually show the world, “Okay, cool, you know what, this is what this guy can do” – that was quite satisfying for me.Left-arm wristspinners are still relatively unusual in the world game. Do you feel like there’s still a novelty factor that can work in your favour?
I suppose so, but then again, the game has changed so much. Guys are batting left-handed when they’re supposed to be a right-handed batsman, and reverse-whooping fast bowlers. That might previously have been the case when India came through with Kuldeep Yadav, but I think guys have adapted. That’s the game: bowlers come up with something and then batsmen innovate. At the end of the day, you have to put the ball in the right area with the right variations, no matter whether you’re bowling with the right arm or the left arm. That’s the key.Do you put extra focus on the first spell of a match or a tour with that in mind – knowing that batters won’t have faced much left-arm wristspin in the nets?
I don’t think you get any freebies in international cricket, especially against the stronger teams. My basics don’t change whether I’m playing against the guy for the first time or he’s played against me a lot. It’s more of your prep as a player that gives you confidence. If he’s on the field with you playing international cricket, he’s a pretty good player.”At the end of the day, you have to put the ball in the right area with the right variations, whether you’re bowling with the right arm or the left”•Pankaj Nangia/Gallo Images/Getty ImagesWhen it comes to preparation, how much use do you make of analysis of the opposition?
It’s either for you or it’s not for you. You get some guys that are mavericks that just want to go out there on feel, but I feel that definitely, for me personally, it gives me an edge in my prep. I am a free-spirited person – you see that with my celebrations and the way I go about life – but if that [analytics] can give you a slight indication of what a batsman might be doing, why not take that opportunity?You can be a maverick on the field but you can be better if you have prior knowledge – something that can maybe prepare you or make you aware of what the batsman might be trying to do. That’s why I dive quite a lot into the analysis. And then I like to prepare according to how I feel I should be bowling against a specific batsman.What would you be looking at the night before a game when you’re speaking with South Africa analyst Rivash Gobind?
It will be footage, stats, wagon wheels – all that stuff is pretty standard in international cricket now. But it’s about how you interpret the information. The information can be there and each guy will take whatever works for them. I’m the same: I won’t use every piece of information, but I take what I think is relevant for my bowling.Reece Topley said last week that learning about the mental side of international cricket is just as important, if not more, than skills for white-ball bowlers in 2022. Do you agree?
Hundred percent. When you’re playing international cricket, there can’t be a 70% difference between my skill versus your skill. We’re all good players, that’s why we’ve made it that far. It’s more of a mental thing. I know I’m a good bowler, you know you’re a good batsman. It’s about how we tackle each other mentally and who has more faith in their ability and execution. Skill-wise, we’re all on a specific level. Yes, some guys are slightly better than others, but I don’t think the difference is as big as it is mentally. That’s what makes great players great: their mental approach to the game and their belief in their ability.

“Earlier I would play one game, then another three months later. Now you play on Wednesday and if you make a mistake, you can correct that on Friday. That’s the only way a player can improve: if he’s backed and he’s given enough opportunity”

South Africa won four games out of five at the T20 World Cup last year but couldn’t reach the knockout stages. Do you feel like you can get to the semi-finals and beyond in Australia this year?
As a squad we’re in a good place. There’s always things that you’re working on and the World Cup is definitely something that’s at the back of every team’s mind. Funnily enough, now it’s easier for people to see that South Africa may have one of the better bowling attacks in the world. I’ve been saying that for the past 18 months because I’m part of the team. When I look around and see the guy to my left and the guy to my right, I see the composition of the bowling attack and I see a lot of guys that can take wickets. Every single guy in our attack is capable of taking wickets. I can only speak for the bowling group but I feel like we have all our bases covered.You’ve become renowned for your celebrations. Do you have anything specific planned for this tour – and did you see your compatriot Rilee Rossouw’s celebration last week?
I did! I feel like I’ve toned them down quite a lot since I became a dad. My philosophy of my celebrations is that you’re playing against the best players in the world and it’s become our job to be doing it professionally, so that’s my way of enjoying myself. All of us started doing this thing because we enjoyed it, then we got good at it because we were having fun, then we got higher and higher and now it becomes more intense because your performances are being scrutinised. Every move you make is being assessed and you’re playing because it’s your job.I don’t want to lose that fun factor and celebrating helps to take the pressure off. Once I’ve taken a wicket, I’m enjoying myself because, flip, I’ve worked hard to be where I am and I’m well aware that it’s not going to last forever – that’s just how bodies work. I want to enjoy cricket while I’m playing and make memories that I’ll have once I’m done, for my kids, for my family. Just because I’m earning money from the game and my job is dependent on my performances, I don’t want to just be all serious or not be myself. I want to have fun.

How Robin Uthappa struggled to find himself and succeeded

The India and Karnataka batter, who retired from international cricket recently, spoke about his long-running battles with mental-health issues off the field

Sidharth Monga03-Oct-2022Robin Uthappa has on his right forearm a tattoo that says “I am.”It is a commemoration, he says, of finding himself, of recovery. It is what he pointed to when I asked him to introduce himself on the podcast.I didn’t want to introduce him because over three days of extended conversations, I knew cricket was an important part of his life, part of his oldest memory even, but it is not what he should be defined by. He spoke a lot about the role of spirituality in recovery. He knew who he was. He was at peace with who he was. It was best he told people who he was.We recorded on the last day of Suicide Prevention Week, which was nothing but a coincidence. The only instrument we had was a phone. We were not in a studio but in my hotel room, a few doors down from his. At 9am sharp he knocked on my door in the oversized co-ords that he loves to wear and changes into the moment he goes off air. He carried two pouches of instant coffee in his hand.He was fascinated that I found peace in my belief that everything in life is random: good fortune and bad fortune exist but they are random. We debated that before we started recording. I told him I was not going to prod him; he could share however much he wanted to share. I told him about a Jeff Finlin book on recovery that I was reading.Finlin is possibly the greatest modern Western singer-songwriter without a Wikipedia page. He had a traumatic childhood, battled alcoholism and PTSD, and his work has never made it popularly. JR Moehringer, the Pulitzer-winning writer who, among other things, co-wrote Andre Agassi’s autobiography, called Finlin “an undiscovered Bob Dylan”. Listen to him. You will find it is no exaggeration.

Listen to the podcastIn his book , Finlin writes of the five or sheaths that make up a human body according to “yogic lore”. The first four sheaths are a physical accumulation of human experiences, of reactions to trauma, of addiction centres. For sufferers of addiction, trauma and codependency, Finlin says it is important to access the self beyond these four sheaths.That is when one really finds themselves, and ceases being just an accumulation of experience and hardwiring. When those in recovery identify themselves through the fifth, spiritual, sheath, they identify as “I am”.”That is what we are trying to recover,” Finlin writes.

****

As a boy, Uthappa was a prodigy. At 14 he scored a triple-century in the final of an Under-16 zonal selection tournament. When he came back to Karnataka, his home state, he was told he was not being selected because other children and their parents complained he was too “aggressive”. They used to think he was over-age. You sit in a room with him and you realise how big he is without being imposing or intimidating. The steroidal medication he took for epilepsy made him grow a little disproportionately. He was a big boy but didn’t get as tall as he ought to have been for the size of his limbs.Related

  • Uthappa announces retirement from international and Indian cricket

  • 'Felt like I was the loneliest guy in the world' – Virat Kohli on his 'lowest point'

  • Does India have a plan for the mental health of its players?

  • 'I couldn't handle being the best because the only way was down'

  • What can cricketers do about mental illness?

The son of a gifted hockey player who couldn’t realise his potential because of what Uthappa describes as bureaucracy in team sport in India, he quit cricket and went to Coorg with his family, only to be coaxed back by Makarand Waingankar of the newly formed Karnataka Cricket Academy.Three years later, at 17, Uthappa made his first-class debut and scored 40 off 32 batting at No. 3 on the first morning.Uthappa has retired from all forms of cricket in India with no international century or Test cap to his name. His most important innings, though, carries on.

****

Uthappa was a child trapped in his parents’ bad marriage. He was a prodigy who somehow believed – we make weird correlations when we are kids – the only way to keep his parents from imploding was to keep playing cricket well. He played what should have been the best years of his cricket with the responsibility of his family on his mind, the fear their dysfunction would spill out into the open. He envied those with more stable families. and bore the guilt that comes with not wanting to be seen as the child of your parents.Clinically depressed, given to suicidal thoughts, Uthappa spent his twenties clutching on to dear life. He knew little else. He told me on the podcast of how he eventually had to cut his family off, which took a lot of courage. In his mid-20s he would change his phone number every few months.Uthappa at the 2004 Under-19 World Cup, where he made 237 runs from seven games to be India’s third-highest top scorer, struggling with the weight of off-field problems•Farjana K Godhuly/AFP/Getty ImagesThe number I had for him was from around 2012. Life was just a haze for him back then. He played in it but doesn’t remember anything from the 2011 IPL. I felt bad I hadn’t contacted him other than outside nets and on cricket grounds in ten years. I don’t like to bother cricketers unnecessarily. I imagine them to be strong, with support systems in place for when they are not strong. Nor am I under any illusion that I am capable of helping.It is all wrong. Uthappa is a reminder to us that cricketers suffer much the same as others, perhaps even more because of the hyper-competitive environment they find themselves in – which can be at odds with the ethos of a team sport. Not everyone has a support system; thankfully Uthappa had his counsellor in addition to his partner, Sheethal, to help him recover. He is an inspiration to cricketers who are not feeling well, telling them that it is okay to be vulnerable, that help is available and that they don’t need to hide their anguish. He is an inspiration to everyone, and not just cricketers, that family dysfunction and mental disorder are not things to be ashamed of; you are better off acknowledging and addressing them.To cricketers, Uthappa’s advice is that they have a professional team: a personal cricket-skills coach and a mental-skills coach. Apart from the cricket-skills coaches, teams should have a psychologist, even if only to be called on in an emergency when cricketers are on tour. The BCCI needs to set up systems to look after the mental health of every cricketer under its ambit, and not let the sheer volume of talent available in the country breed contempt and neglect. That’s something Uthappa would love to help set up.

****

Knowing what you know, it is impossible to look at Uthappa the cricketer independent of Uthappa the person, but the scorebooks don’t make that allowance. They will tell you he averaged around 25 in internationals and around 41 in first-class cricket – meagre returns for a prodigious talent.Uthappa with his wife, former tennis player Sheethal Goutham, whose support has been instrumental in his battles against mental illness•Getty ImagesAt 13 he was already part of the Karnataka U-19 camp, smacking future India and Karnataka bowlers – a good five-six years older – for sixes. When those expecting some respect for days cricket confronted him, he said it was not his fault but that of bowlers who bowled in his zone. Those watching the camp expected him to be an India cricketer in five years. Waingankar, who convinced him to come back at 14 and remained a mentor to him, used to call him Viv.Uthappa was a new-age batter with scant regard for survival over run-scoring, but he also held the Test cap in high regard. In pursuit of it he hired a personal coach, Praveen Amre, dismantled his game completely and built it from the bottom up. It showed results in two seasons when he averaged over 50, 2014-15 and 2015-16. In the first of those seasons Karnataka successfully defended their triple of Ranji, Vijay Hazare and Irani titles.The Test cap was not meant to be. In limited-overs cricket Uthappa was forever doomed: the top four was jampacked with Virender Sehwag, Sachin Tendulkar, Gautam Gambhir and Rahul Dravid, and the three middle-order batters had to be MS Dhoni and two batters who could also bowl. When slots opened up and Rohit Sharma got room to move up the order, Uthappa wasn’t mentally there. In hindsight he empathises with the calls leaders had to make, but he would have liked better communication because the cricketer is a human and not a commodity.Uthappa wasn’t everyone’s cup of tea. He himself will tell you he was a difficult, unpredictable colleague. And a mischievous one. That was perhaps a manifestation of the angst and turmoil he experienced at home.With Sourav Ganguly in 2007. Uthappa has spoken about that having been a year where he feared his parents’ rocky relationship would damage his own life•AFPHe spent the two 2007 World Cups and tours of England and Bangladesh in constant fear of his parents’ issues spilling out into the open. All the time he fought fires remotely. When he was dropped from the international side in July 2008, he decided to spend the time before the start of the domestic season actively helping his parents mend their relationship, as opposed to just playing, in the belief that that was what kept them happy. It didn’t work. Finances had always been a problem, so he spent his IPL money. As expected, that too didn’t help. He gave them time and presence, but that didn’t work either. Before he knew, what he thought would be a quick off-season job consumed all of him and half his cricketing life was over.It was only in the second half of his career that Uthappa found himself. Keeping wicket rejuvenated him on the field. He enjoyed this period, though there was little international cricket available to him. He retires knowing he is a T20 World Cup champion and a two-time IPL winner. He still loves cricket. More leagues outside India hopefully await.Uthappa knows the pitfalls of mental health never disappear, but he is confident he can stay vigilant. Most importantly he knows: “I am.” It is a state of bliss that doesn’t need scorebooks.If you or someone you know has thoughts of suicide or self-harm, know that there is help available. Please call one of these helpline numbers (India)

Labuschagne, Head lead strong batting display to tune out off-field noise

Warner’s words on his captaincy ban dominated conversations but, out in the middle, a depleted West Indies attack meant it was business as usual for Australia

Andrew McGlashan08-Dec-2022One of Australia’s greatest batters sent shockwaves through the game in Adelaide. There were gasps of amazement at the events unfolding. What would it mean for him, and the match?Steven Smith had been dismissed against West Indies. Something that had not happened since December 10, 2015. And it was for a duck. A lot has gone on in Australia cricket since then.Playing slightly early at a drive, he offered a low return catch to Jason Holder who stooped to take it by his ankles. Smith threw his head back in frustration – or maybe disgust – because this was not a day to be missing out.Related

  • Neser leads Australia charge under lights after Head's run-out anguish

  • Head's love affair with Adelaide continues

  • Warner's full statement about his leadership ban review

  • Labuschagne displaces Root to become No. 1 Test batter

  • Labuschagne and Head post dominant twin tons

At 131 for 3, West Indies, almost out of nowhere, given their threadbare resources, had a glimmer of putting some pressure on Australia. But, as a final tally of 330 for 3 would attest, with the familiar sight of the newly-minted No. 1 Test batter Marnus Labuschagne making another century and a hometown hundred for Travis Head, that was as good as it got.It was just the sort of dominant batting display that Australia needed to avoid the off-field noise following them into the middle even if, in reality, given the support for David Warner inside the team, it was unlikely to transpire that way.Inevitably, though, the events of the previous evening when Warner dropped his 793-word statement dominated much of the conversation around the day, particularly when his manager did an incendiary radio interview.David Warner’s innings was cut short at 21•Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesFor a little while it was possible to imagine Warner’s response to his off-field anger could translate into something spectacular in the middle. He drove the first ball of the match through the covers for three. Alzarri Joseph gave him some uncomfortable moments, but when he struck three crisp boundaries in the ninth over, it looked like it could be about to cut loose.However, two balls later he went after a wide delivery and edged a big drive through to the keeper. Warner groaned. He could no longer distract himself – and others – from the middle.Still, for the next three hours it was possible to ponder whether Australia would lose another wicket. Roston Chase was bowling in the 10th over and soon had a deep point; Marquino Mindley’s Test debut lasted two overs before he tweaked a hamstring (he had an almost impossible ask made of him after a 36-hour journey from Jamaica just two days before the match); captain Kraigg Brathwaite was floating up his straight-breaks before the dinner break; and to cap it off they had a substitute fielder, Omar Phillips, plucked out of Melbourne grade cricket.To West Indies’ credit they did not let the run-rate get away from them, although when Devon Thomas was summoned to the bowling crease it did not immediately bode well. Yet, almost out of nowhere he had Usman Khawaja lbw with a ball just shaving leg stump from round the wicket.Holder then reduced Smith’s average against West Indies from 239 to 179 but he and Joseph couldn’t keep going. With Mindley off for a scan, options were limited and the half hour leading into the tea break saw Chase and Brathwaite operate in tandem. With the dynamics of a day-night Test, and the desire to have fresh quicks for the final session, there was some logic to it, but it did not impress Ricky Ponting.”It’s just rubbish bowling,” he said on Channel 7. “They’ve just given away 30 runs. They built the pressure up. Jason Holder will be absolutely spewing. Bent his back, did everything right, disciplined, executed really well, only for this to happen.”West Indies head coach Phil Simmons was more measured and praised Brathwaite of juggling his depleted attack. The quicks returned after the interval with Anderson Phillip putting in a good shift to support Holder and Joseph but it didn’t bring any reward. Head was not always secure, beaten on occasions outside off as he looked to drive, which is part of the trade-off for his positive approach, but Labuschagne barely put a foot wrong although he later said he felt this was a grinding effort.The pitch did not really have the pace to test him with the short ball as Joseph had done in Perth, although it may still have been underdone. Just four of the 59 balls he bowled to Labuschagne were logged as short albeit they cost 10 runs.When he sliced Thomas through backward point he made it centuries in three consecutive innings for the second time of a career that is only 30 matches old. For now, his average also ticked above Smith’s. There should be tougher challenges ahead against South Africa, but he is on for a gargantuan season.As the clock ticked over to 10pm he worked the final ball of the day to midwicket. An Australia batter who will likely be remembered as a great, if he hasn’t already done enough to be regarded in that category, strode off with thoughts, no doubt, of another double tomorrow. It was normal service for Australia. On the field, at least.

Unadkat: 'I see Saurashtra being a formidable force across formats for a long period of time'

Saurashtra captain elaborates on what has gone into the makings of his team’s white-ball revolution

Shashank Kishore01-Dec-2022″We’ve earned our right to be in the final,” a chuffed Jaydev Unadkat says after a rigorous gym session that has kept him busy all afternoon in Ahmedabad. A day out from Saurashtra’s second Vijay Hazare final, Unadkat still has one final team meeting over . He wants to simply remind his players that beating Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, two white-ball giants in domestic cricket, is a good enough endorsement of their credentials as “one of the best white-ball teams in India” currently. Looking ahead to the final, Unadkat, who is the joint-highest wicket-taker this season with 18 scalps, elaborated on what has gone into the makings of Saurashtra’s white-ball revolution.There was a time when making the knockouts seemed big. Now, Saurashtra are consistently making the finals. What has changed?
I think it’s got to do a lot with the overall culture we’ve been able to develop. In 2018-19, we decided it was important to rework our white-ball template. We’d been pretty successful for nearly a decade in Ranji Trophy [Saurashtra made three finals], but we weren’t up to the mark in the shorter formats. With the bat, we lacked that fearlessness. We lacked a bit of X-factor in the bowling. On the field, we weren’t the fittest and you could see it. We didn’t have a full-time fitness trainer until the start of this year.So we identified issues we wanted to work on, and the changes we wanted to incorporate for a while is bearing results now, from last year especially. The good thing about our team is if we decide something, the guys are ready to pounce on ideas and go with the flow. We’re just a close group of 13-14 individuals who keep playing continuously. Our depth isn’t massive, so continuity has helped. This [season] is in many ways has been a reflection of the brand of cricket we’ve wanted to play.Related

  • Jackson and Jani play starring roles as Saurashtra win Vijay Hazare Trophy

  • Maharashtra to take on Saurashtra in Vijay Hazare Trophy final

  • Saurashtra's fantastic bowling vs Maharashtra's marauding batting

You spoke of not having the X factor. How have you developed this?
We weren’t a side that got a lot of early breakthroughs, but over the last two seasons or so we’ve been able to. Having Chetan Sakariya has helped me as well, we’ve been able to create pressure from both ends. Dharmendra [Jadeja], Prerak [Mankad] and Chirag [Jani] have become better white-ball bowlers in terms of taking wickets in the middle overs. The roles have become clearer.With the bat, we had to be fearless. Our batters were restricting themselves from going all out and playing shots, which at the moment is needed in white-ball cricket. You have to take chances in the powerplay; even in the middle overs with five fielders in, you have to take your chances. We didn’t have the mindset to be free, and when batters didn’t succeed with the shots in trying to be adventurous, we didn’t blame them because once you do that, it starts playing on our mind. We controlled that and gave them the room they needed to play shots. That has worked and has become our X-factor now.

“I love playing with this bunch and when you’re looking for the team’s success over individual milestones, that becomes a motivation in itself”Jaydev Unadkat

A lot of teams struggle to have one seam-bowling allrounder. You have two in Prerak Mankad and Chirag Jani, maybe three if you include yourself.
If you see, the way they’ve been able to keep up the pressure after Chetan and I finish has helped. In the semi-final also, if it wasn’t for them, Karnataka may have had a window where they could’ve broken the shackles. It didn’t happen. With the bat too, Prerak comes in at [No.] 5-6, Chirag at 6-7 and they get important runs. With me at 8, they have the freedom and flexibility. The three of us have been able to give the top-order batters the cushion to play freely. They know if they aren’t there for the last 10 overs, we’ve still got capable batters who can hit the long ball in the death overs. That’s given some security in the batting line-up. It’s the allrounders who’ve been providing the balance in this team.You speak of cushion and being flexible. You implemented it by having Sheldon Jackson open. Was that tactical?
Yes, absolutely. Once Cheteshwar [Pujara] went to prepare for the Bangladesh Tests, we thought we needed someone experienced in the top three. With games starting at 9[am] and the ball moving around, you need someone who has that experience. I thought having three young guys at the top would’ve left us vulnerable. We wanted to ensure they can play their game and have the experienced players absorb any pressure there may be. Sheldon had done the job earlier as well, so there were no second thoughts.Tell us about the youngsters coming through. Is the talent pool growing?
The Saurashtra Premier League has been a massive boost. It has helped players play competitive games with the state players and also helped develop game sense. It’s made players less nervous. It has helped prepare them. Someone like Jay Gohil, who just made his List A debut in the quarter-finals. He was fearless, applied himself properly, [and] wasn’t rushed, exuded composure. He looked anything but nervous. Someone like Tarang Gohel, who made his T20 debut for us this year – he also looked fearless. There are a couple of others in the Under-19s and Under-23s who are in my sights, and they too will get their chances soon. We’ve tried to ensure the culture we’ve built at the top is able to trickle down to the age-group levels as well. I see us being a formidable force across formats for a long period of time. That’s always been the goal.Was there a game where you felt the team really turned a corner during this campaign?
In the game against Gujarat in Delhi, we were three down in the first six overs. From there, the way we were able to build an innings on a surface that was doing quite a lot showed our character. That gave us a lot of confidence. It’s not about conditions or about us struggling if the top order doesn’t fire. We have guys who can stand up for the team and deliver at different times. Essentially, we’ve tried to develop a mindset where we aren’t reliant on toss and luck.Let us talk about you. Season after season, you pick wickets but get snubbed when it comes to India selection, or maybe even India A selection. How have you channeled that hurt into this relentless pursuit of excellence with Saurashtra?
The love for Saurashtra keeps me going. Since being captain, I’ve developed this mindset of attachment with the team, not that it wasn’t there earlier. I love playing with this bunch and when you’re looking for the team’s success over individual milestones, that becomes a motivation in itself. Yes, I do look to give my fullest because I know that if I don’t lead from the front, it won’t set the tone. I do look at my individual performances, but from a way that it takes the team through, not in a way where I think if it will help me get selected for India or India A. At the end of the day, that’s the space you want be in and I’m happily trying to help the team win as many games as possible. If you love the way you play the game, all other things will fall in place. I love this space and the mindset I’m currently in and don’t want to change that for anything. But the hunger and fire to play and perform for the country is still burning bright.

RCB's Impact Player strategy allows du Plessis and Harshal to flourish

Both players were carrying injuries that might have ruled them out in normal circumstances

Matt Roller23-Apr-2023Abdul Basith walked to the middle at Bengaluru’s imposing Chinnaswamy Stadium needing to hit 10 runs off his first two balls in IPL cricket to clinch a victory for Rajasthan Royals against Royal Challengers Bangalore.He looked around briefly to scope out his boundary options, then limbered up as Harshal Patel ran in to bowl. He shaped to power him over the leg side, lining up the stands at deep midwicket, but was foxed by Harshal’s slower ball. The ball dribbled away for a single, and the game was RCB’s.Related

  • Mike Hesson: 'There are no soft overs now. Sides keep coming hard at you all the time'

  • How much impact has the Impact Player rule had on IPL 2023?

  • Maxwell and du Plessis set RCB up for tight victory

This was a moment that exposed the difference in utility that these two teams had extracted from the Impact Player rule, a rule which has fundamentally altered the nature of selection in T20 cricket. IPL games can – and often do – turn in a single ball; off the penultimate one of the game, RCB’s substitute got the better of Royals’ and clinched the points.Faf du Plessis is having a phenomenal IPL. Nearly halfway through the league stage, he is the Orange Cap holder, has scored five half-centuries in seven innings, and is striking at 165.30. Most top T20 batters are either destructive or dependable; this version of du Plessis falls into a rare category that are both.This stellar run of form has come at 38, an age where most cricketers are long retired and working in coaching or broadcasting. Remarkably, du Plessis has done it despite suffering a grade-one intercostal strain, which would have ruled him out of his team’s last two games in any other franchise league.But the Impact Player rule has enabled him to play despite his injury. Against Punjab Kings on Thursday, he made 84 off 56 as a specialist batter, before he was replaced at the innings break. Back in Bengaluru on Sunday afternoon, he set up a second consecutive win against Royals with 62 off 39 before again being replaced at the interval.Faf du Plessis has been carrying a grade-one intercostal strain•BCCIRCB have twice made late decisions over du Plessis’ participation as a fielder. He may be able to return to his role as captain – and boundary-rider – in their game against Kolkata Knight Riders on Wednesday, but for now he can console himself with the knowledge that he has made major contributions in games he would not otherwise have played.During their win over Kings, du Plessis admitted his inclusion “probably wouldn’t have been possible” but for the Impact rule. “I saw some of the boys were trying to do this new rule now where they bat and they don’t field, so I thought I’d try it out,” he joked to the host broadcaster.The injury has clearly caused him discomfort. Thirteen overs into Sunday’s game, at the second strategic time-out, du Plessis ran straight to the dugout after batting for over an hour in the afternoon sun; two balls later, he was run out, the first time in three IPL seasons he has been dismissed by that method.Harshal, his replacement on Sunday, provided further evidence of RCB maximising the new rule. He suffered an injury while fielding during their victory over Kings; like du Plessis, he might well have missed the game but for the Impact Player rule allowing him to feature in one innings only.He arrived at the Chinnaswamy with the little finger on his left hand heavily strapped, limiting his ability to grip the bat; he later suggested that he hopes it will heal “in a week or two”. As a result, he was used exclusively as a bowler, replacing du Plessis at the innings break and bowling his four overs in the run chase.After a slow start to the IPL, Harshal put in his best performance of the season, taking three vital wickets as Royals fell just short in their run chase: Yashasvi Jaiswal, mistiming a full toss to long-on; Sanju Samson, fencing an effort ball to short third; and R Ashwin, dragging a slower ball to deep midwicket after giving RCB a scare.The injured little finger in Harshal Patel’s left hand would have limited his ability to bat, if he had been required to do so•BCCI”The way we’ve been able to use Faf as a batter and myself as a bowler in this game has been really good for us,” Harshal said. “Both of us are carrying injuries which don’t allow us to execute one of our skills: for him, it’s fielding; for me, it’s batting. The Impact [Player] rule allows us to just go out and take care of our primary skills.”RCB were even able to find another loophole which they happily exploited. When Harshal briefly went off the field at the start of the fourth over, after fielding a ball at deep third, the fact that du Plessis was off the field enabled them to use an overseas player – Finn Allen – as a fielding substitute for two overs, since they otherwise only had three overseas players on the field.But while most teams have used the rule in a similar fashion to one another this season – effectively picking a 12-man team, and replacing a specialist batter with a specialist bowler – Royals have differed, as their captain Samson suggested at the toss. “We’re starting with the same XI [either way],” he said. “We might add, or we might not add.”Royals have generally selected the same balance regardless of whether they have batted or bowled first this year, featuring six batters and five frontline bowlers. They have often delayed a decision on their substitution until midway through the second innings; some calls have worked well – bringing on Adam Zampa at Chepauk, for example – but others have not.Sunday’s game appeared to expose the issues with their method. In limiting themselves to five bowling options, Royals did not have much flexibility with the ball, with no choice but to use Sandeep Sharma at the death despite his off-day. And in the absence of Riyan Parag, who did not travel to Bengaluru, they found themselves bringing in an IPL debutant at No. 8 – leaving Jason Holder unused with the bat for the fourth time in his six appearances this season.Royals’ results this season have been significantly better when batting first (played three, won three) than chasing (playing four, lost three), and perhaps their use of the Impact rule is a reason behind that. As the conclusion to Sunday’s game confirmed, the rule has suited some teams much better than others.

Mission Impossible: the quest for World Cup tickets

Our correspondent also finds Barbenheimer parallels in cricket, and looks at what Tamim Iqbal can learn from Stuart Broad

Alan Gardner14-Aug-2023It’s the cross-cultural event of the northern summer. It’s a vibe, it’s a thing, it’s mainly about selling tickets. On the one hand, a big pink slice of neon smiles and feel-good frippery. On the other, classical cinematography, weighty themes and serious-looking men in old-fashioned clothes. We are, of course, talking about Barbenheimer and the ongoing attempts to create a world where Test cricket can happily coincide with T20.It’s not quite the same as watching both back-to-back in one sitting, but launching into a month of the Hundred the day after the conclusion of the one of the most box-office men’s Ashes of all time – not to mention a critically acclaimed women’s series – felt like a pretty similar move by the ECB. Although a BBC-accredited doofus with a microphone literally describing Maitlan Brown as “a little Barbie yourself” during the opening game was probably not the look they were after.No doubt the Ashes will be up for several awards when the academy sits down to take a view. Ben Stokes proclaimed afterwards that the series between England and Australia was “generally what Test cricket needed” – which must be good news for the likes of South Africa, Sri Lanka and West Indies, who barely have two cents to rub together, never mind two Tests. But then, like , what would the discussion around the format be without a heavy dose of nihilism?As for whether we will ever reach a point with T20 leagues where people say, “I’ve had Kenough” – well, it seems very much moot. The Hundred was dreamed up by the ECB to insulate English cricket from the biting winds sweeping through the game’s shifting global landscape, but while arguably doing more for feminism than , it already faces being cannibalised by the free marketeers investing heavily in Major League Cricket, Global T20 Canada and the like.Where does that leave us, the humble fan? Well, sit down and shut up because cricket’s version of – the bloated star vehicle that is the 50-over World Cup – is soon to be showing on all channels. Just don’t ask about getting tickets to see that one.

****

Tell us you’re a byword for administrative incompetence without telling us you’re a byword for administrative incompetence – amirite, BCCI? Then again, if you’re in charge of organising a World Cup, more than a decade after your team last managed to win the tournament, then perhaps building in a little extra home advantage is to be expected. Touring teams will not only have to spend six weeks getting used to the conditions, the travel and the cultural differences – they’re also going to need a dedicated backroom staffer keeping an eye on the fixtures to make sure their next match hasn’t been brought forward a day and moved from Lucknow to Hyderabad at short notice.

****

It’s okay, everyone. There’s no racism in cricket! Despite what you might have seen or heard from the recent ICEC report, the Azeem Rafiq scandal at Yorkshire, and public testimony from current and former players, everything is just fine and dandy in the English game, because Ian Botham says so. “I have never witnessed or been in the dressing room with any form of racism,” said Baron Botham of Ravensworth (formerly Sir Iron Bottom), to give him his full title. “You cannot generalise as that document does,” he said of the ICEC report, while offering a generalised summary of the whole thing as “nonsense”, most of which he hadn’t read anyway. But he’s friends with Sir Viv and once met Mandela, so we should probably just take his word for it.

****

Stuart Broad was always a man who knew his mind and didn’t try to second-guess. Exhibit A: the celebrappeal, which was not so much asking the umpire’s opinion on a dismissal as allowing him time to catch up on the facts according to Stuart. So when he decided to call it a day, it was done – cue the farewell montages. Contrast with Tamim Iqbal, who has had a little trouble with the decision-making process recently. Last month, he announced his international retirement, only for it to be struck down by Bangladesh’s prime minister on review. Now he has made another bid for freedom by quitting the ODI captaincy. This one appears to have snuck through on umpire’s call, but Tamim could do worse than consult with Broad, the self-proclaimed “best in the world at DRS”, before making his next career move.

An atmosphere like never before, but it could have been so much more

The 100,000-strong Ahmedabad crowd made itself heard, but it was a shame there was almost no green in that vastness of blue

Sambit Bal14-Oct-2023There is noise. And, then there is noise as force: pure, purposeful, and meant to deliver a punch.Through the years of the IPL, and the multitude of T20 leagues, we have grown accustomed to the former kind. It’s constant, blaring, engineered and soulless. Noise for the sake of noise: you must make plenty of it because it’s being demanded, and it’s supposed to be part of the entertainment bundle you signed up for.You scream at fours and sixes, you flail about between balls and overs, you sway sideways, flash your phone lights, become part of Mexican waves: you are part of the performance, you allow yourself to be conducted. You know it, and the players know it. They block it out as white noise.And then you get to places and matches where the crowds know what they are doing.Related

  • PCB files complaint with ICC over 'inappropriate conduct by spectators' at India vs Pakistan game

  • ICC chair Barclay on Arthur remark: 'Will review all criticisms'

  • Mickey Arthur: 'It didn't seem like an ICC event, it seemed like a BCCI event'

  • Jasprit Bumrah and spin do the trick as India hand Pakistan another World Cup beating

  • India's bowling unit: Gods of small things

The Narendra Modi Stadium is built to be imposing, a nod to muscular exhibitionism and a symbol of Indian cricket’s pole position in the sport. It beats the Melbourne Cricket Ground by at least 20,000 seats, and though not as tall and colosseum-like as the MCG, its vastness makes it feel as gladiatorial. And it’s safe to say that cricket has never seen as many blue jerseys at a venue as it did today.Every inch of this stadium was packed for the last IPL final despite it being pushed by a day on account of rain but never had this ground hosted an India match of this magnitude. The previous ODI games here were played during the Covid era, and the Test match during Border-Gavaskar Trophy, despite the pomp of two prime ministers making a grandstand appearance, was thinly attended. So here it was, the real deal, the day this stadium you hope was built for, to be bathed in cacophonous blue. And when the moments came, it produced the noise so quintessentially organic to the Indian cricket experience.It began in the middle of that phase when Jasprit Bumrah and Kuldeep Yadav, whose originality and wicket-taking threat form the heart of this versatile Indian bowling machine, were hastening a Pakistani meltdown from a cushy 155 for 2. Stadium regulars would know the drill. The routine begins at the start of the bowler’s run-up with a collective swoosh and gathers decibels in sync with the bowler – in this case Bumrah – running in, reaching peak volume at the point of delivery. It’s rhythmic, full of intent, and if you are the batter, full of menace.This is a case of fans recognising a moment and becoming one with it. Players recognise this too, and they feel the energy and feed off it.No Pakistani cricketer would have played before a crowd as large, and as vociferously partisan, as this and though international players are internally wired to steel themselves against it, for them not to sense this air of intimidation would have been impossible. They would have expected it and prepared for it, but having never played India in India, and having played all their World Cup games against other teams in friendly Hyderabad, an experience such as this needs to be lived to be learnt. As forgettable as their performance was at this ground, the experience might remain unforgettable.No ambiguity in whom the fans are supporting•ICC/Getty ImagesIt didn’t have to be this one-sided though. The last time these two teams met at an ICC event, the crowd was nearly as large. And Virat Kohli’s biomechanics-defying six off Haris Rauf, followed by another to tilt a near-impossible equation towards India, turned the match into a humdinger. But though, like everywhere else, the Indian fans easily outnumbered the Pakistanis, there was at least a contest in the stands. And from all accounts, the sloganeering, baiting and banter was good-natured, and it spilt over to the streets and pubs in the evening.I have watched India and Pakistan play in Lahore, Bengaluru, Adelaide, Centurion, Johannesburg, and now Ahmedabad, and never has a cricket ground felt so hopelessly lacking in something so essential: one group of fans. A small group of Pakistani journalists have finally made it to the tournament, after their long wait for a visa to India ended just in time for this game, but no fans have managed to cross the border yet. And there is no word yet on whether they will be able to.Mickey Arthur, the Pakistan team director, didn’t mince his words after the game. “It didn’t seem like an ICC event tonight, let’s be brutally honest,” he said at the press conference. “It seemed like a bilateral series, a BCCI event. I didn’t hear coming through the microphones tonight. Yes, that [the possibility of being intimidated by a partisan crowd] does play a role, but I’m not going to use that as an excuse. For us, it was about living the moment, it was about the next ball, and it was about how we’re going to combat the Indian players.”Pakistan, in keeping with their performance against India in the World Cup – 0-8 with this defeat – were abysmal once again. But despite that, this match was this tournament’s biggest draw. And Arthur was spot on. The World Cup is billed, rightfully, as the biggest festival of cricket, and it will continue to feel like a travesty, and an act of neglect, if the organisers fail to ensure the participation of the whole cricket world in it, particularly those who give it colour and life.

'The ECB were very supportive' – Jamie Smith on putting ILT20 before England Lions

Surrey wicketkeeper opts to hone white-ball skills rather than be involved on tour of India

Matt Roller16-Jan-2024When England Lions line up against India A at the Narendra Modi Stadium on Wednesday, one player will be conspicuous by his absence. Jamie Smith hit a 71-ball century in the Lions’ most recent first-class match against Sri Lanka in the spring, but will be 1000 miles away from Ahmedabad preparing for the ILT20 in the UAE.Smith, a Surrey academy product, made his ODI debut in September and is widely considered to be a future England Test wicketkeeper. His record-breaking hundred for the Lions last year earned him rave reviews from Ian Bell, the Lions’ batting coach, and was enough to catch Ben Stokes’ eye while England were on tour in New Zealand.But rather than spending a second successive winter with the Lions, he has opted to fulfil a contract with Gulf Giants, where he will play under former England coach Andy Flower. It is a decision that many would interpret as a statement of priorities, but Smith himself is clear that it will help him achieve his ambition to be a three-format international cricketer.Related

  • Jamie Smith: England's next wicketkeeper off the rank ready to put his hand up

  • England's new faces to take on Ireland

  • ILT20 becomes first Associate-run franchise league to get 'official' List-A status

  • PSL opener on February 17 to clash with ILT20 final

The ECB management are fully supportive. Smith spoke to Mo Bobat, the board’s departing performance director, before committing to the ILT20 and Rob Key, England’s managing director, is also on board. “It was a very open conversation between us,” Smith told ESPNcricinfo. “It wasn’t a case of ‘you can’t do this’ or ‘you have to do that’.”There’s always going to be a couple of conversations: my main goal is to play Test cricket for England and I don’t want to be blacklisted, but that was never the case and that was reassuring. I want to become a three-format player and I just felt at this time, I’ve probably had more experience in first-class cricket.”Smith has played more T20s (59) than first-class matches (50) but has not had a consistent role, batting everywhere from No. 1-9 in Surrey’s Blast side. “I’m a relative novice in terms of my T20 game,” he said. “I want to get more experience and a bit more exposure against quality overseas players, and expand my game that way.”The ECB were very supportive. I think they appreciate that I’ve spent a lot of time focusing on my red-ball stuff in the last few years. Last November, I was on the Lions camp in Dubai, had Christmas off then went over to Sri Lanka and was into the [county] season. There was no actual time spent practising any white-ball skills.”I was back into red-ball cricket, all the way through to the Blast and the schedule is so hectic. I finished our last Championship game [in May] and we were playing in the Blast straightaway. At the end of the year you always write down little things you want to explore and work on, but there just wasn’t actually any time I could dedicate to that.”

“I want to go out and be proactive in red-ball cricket, put people under pressure. In the past there has been a misconception that you’re only a white-ball player or a red-ball player. You have to look at the bigger picture”

But Smith believes that playing franchise cricket will not only help his T20 game. “I want to go out and be proactive in red-ball cricket anyway, and put people under pressure,” he said. “In the past there has been a misconception that you’re only a white-ball player or a red-ball player, you have to look at the bigger picture.”Whether you’re on a Lions tour or in a franchise competition, you’re still playing games of cricket against high-quality, experienced players and you’re still trying to better yourself. I’d say my T20 game is very similar to my red-ball game and to me, it’s just about batting and improving – whatever environment that is in.”Smith is also conscious that franchises can be fickle. “There’s a limited window when you can get picked up. There are two or three competitions going on at the same time in January and February, then you’ve got the PSL and then ultimately the IPL, which is another aspiration a bit further down the line.”Without putting your name in the hat, you see how people are nowadays: you can just get moved on. There’s so many players out there, and if you don’t start taking a few of these opportunities up then all of a sudden, they will pass you by and there’ll be other players that will go past you.”Smith had his most prolific Championship season in 2023 as Surrey won their second title in a row, averaging 40.88 with two hundreds from No. 4. “I’d had a few goes in the past and people told me, ‘you might struggle with the moving ball’ but this time I made it my own,” he said. “And we came away with another trophy.”He also thrived in his first full season of the Hundred, batting at No. 3 for Birmingham Phoenix after he was picked up for £50,000 in the draft. “They gave me so much confidence. My role was clear from the get-go: you’re not scared of failing because you know you’ll be given the opportunity.”But the highlight of Smith’s summer came at Trent Bridge in September, when he made his England debut as part of a second-string ODI squad that beat Ireland 1-0 in a rain-affected series. “It was an incredibly proud moment for me, and for my family,” he said. “It gave me a snippet of what is hopefully to come.”You want to play in all three formats but to tick off one, nobody can take that away from you.” The second and third ticks are unlikely to be too far away.

How many players have taken a wicket with their first ball in Tests as Shamar Joseph did?

And have any of their first victims averaged more than Steve Smith?

Steven Lynch23-Jan-2024Shamar Joseph’s first two Test wickets were Steve Smith and Marnus Labuschagne, who both average over 50. How rare is this sort of start? asked Brian Williams from Australia

The exciting young West Indian Shamar Joseph turns out to be the 11th bowler whose first two Test wickets were a batter with an average of 50 or above (given a qualification of at least 4000 runs at the time). His victims in Adelaide last week were Steve Smith, who ended the match averaging 57.80, and Marnus Labuschagne (52.03). The last bowler to achieve this was another West Indian, Shermon Lewis, against India in Rajkot in 2018-19. He dismissed Cheteshwar Pujara and Virat Kohli – but India still ran up 649, and Lewis won only one more cap.Pride of place has to go to the old England captain Norman Yardley, whose first two Test wickets were both none other than Don Bradman, who was averaging over 100 at the time. This was during the second and third matches of the 1946-47 Ashes series in Australia, which were Yardley’s fourth and fifth Tests (he didn’t take a wicket in the first three). Again, it didn’t lead to much joy: Bradman had made 234 and 79, and Australia went on to win the series 3-0.Three others dismissed a high-averaging opponent twice to start their careers. Neil Johnson began by removing Sachin Tendulkar in both innings as Zimbabwe pulled off a surprise win over India in Harare in 1998-99. Sri Lanka’s Angelo Mathews dismissed Younis Khan twice in Galle in 2009 . And Moeen Ali marked his debut for England, against Sri Lanka at Lord’s in 2014, by having Kumar Sangakkara caught behind, and got him again in the next Test at Headingley.Three men started their Test bowling careers by dismissing the prolific Indians Virender Sehwag and Rahul Dravid: the Sri Lankan pair of Dhammika Prasad (in Colombo in 2008, when his third wicket was Tendulkar) and Suraj Randiv (also in Colombo, but in 2010), and Australia’s Jason Krejza during his debut 8 for 215 in Nagpur in 2008-09.Jonathan Agnew, now a distinguished broadcaster, made a fine start to what was a brief Test career by dismissing the West Indians Gordon Greenidge and Viv Richards at The Oval in 1984. And in India’s series in Australia in 2003-04, Irfan Pathan started with the wickets of Matthew Hayden in Adelaide and Steve Waugh in Sydney.Shamar Joseph took a wicket with his first ball in Tests. How many people have done this, and has anyone started with a batter with better numbers than Steve Smith? asked Joey Dimattina from Australia

Following a breezy 36 from No. 11 in his maiden innings in Adelaide last week, the new West Indian find Shamar Joseph then became the 23rd bowler to take a wicket with his first ball in a Test match.His first victim was Steve Smith, who had scored 9526 runs at an average of 58.08 at the time. That’s the highest average of any of the victims – Kumar Sangakkara had 8438 runs at 56.25 when he fell to Nathan Lyon’s first ball in Test cricket, in Galle in 2011. But one man had more runs than Smith: Alastair Cook had amassed 9840 (at an average of 46.85) when he fell to Hardus Viljoen’s opening delivery in his only Test for South Africa, in Johannesburg in 2015-16.I noticed that Mayank Agarwal has scored four Test centuries, all of them in India. Is there anyone whose career included more hundreds, all of them at home? asked V Mohan from India

India’s Mayank Agarwal is one of five men who have scored four Test centuries, all of them coming in home games: the others are Joe Hardstaff junior (England), Guy Whittall (Zimbabwe), and the Sri Lankans Roshan Mahanama and Arjuna Ranatunga. Agarwal’s haul includes two double-centuries; Hardstaff, Mahanama and Whittall all made one.But there are two men who made five Test hundreds, all of them on home soil. The first was the old England player Stanley Jackson. His five included two in the 1905 Ashes series, in which he captained England, won all five tosses, was the leading scorer on either side, and also took 13 wickets. All of Jackson’s 20 Tests came in England, as his Wisden obituary noted: “Unfortunately he could not go on any tour to Australia owing to business reasons, and the presence of Lord Hawke in command of Yorkshire until 1910 prevented him from ever being the county captain, though he was occasionally in charge of the side.”The second batter with five Test centuries all on home soil is Chandu Borde, whose five all came in India between 1958-59 and 1966-67. He did play several Tests abroad, and reached 93 against West Indies in Kingston in 1961-62.Neil Harvey (centre), who turned 95 last year, is still the youngest Australian to score a Test century, at 19 years of age in 1948•Getty ImagesNeil Harvey is the oldest living Australian Test player. Is he still the youngest Australian to score a Test hundred? asked Ian Hugo from France

You’re correct that Neil Harvey is the second-oldest surviving Test player as I write – he turned 95 last October. He’s currently one of 21 Test players who are still alive in their nineties. The only one older than Harvey is the South African Ron Draper, who turned 97 just before Christmas: he played two Tests – against an Australian side including Harvey – in 1949-50.And Harvey is still the youngest Australian to score a Test century – he was 19 years 122 days old when he made 153 against India in Melbourne in 1947-48. That broke the previous national record by a month: Archie Jackson was aged 19 years 152 days when he made 164 on debut against England in Adelaide in 1928-29. The only other teenager to score a Test century for Australia is Doug Walters, who was aged 19 years 357 days when he hit 155 against England in Brisbane in 1965-66.Who has scored the most runs without ever making a fifty in Test matches and one-day internationals? asked Sean Fanning from Australia

The leader on the Test list at the moment is Australia’s Nathan Lyon, who has scored 1427 runs in 126 Tests so far with a highest of 47, against South Africa in Cape Town in 2017-18. In second place is another current player, the West Indian Kemar Roach, with 1165 runs and a highest of 41.It’s not impossible that both Lyon and Roach might yet post a half-century, in which case the record would revert to Pakistan’s Waqar Younis (1010 runs, highest score 45), the only other man into four figures in Tests without a fifty.The record in ODIs is held by India’s Harbhajan Singh, whose 1237 runs included a highest score of 49. Zimbabwe’s Paul Strang made 1090 runs in ODIs with a highest of 47. And Waqar Younis is lurking in third place on this list too, with 969 runs and a highest of just 37.Just to complete the set, the the T20I record is currently held by the New Zealander Jimmy Neesham, whose 900 runs include a highest of 48 not out.Shiva Jayaraman of ESPNcricinfo’s stats team helped with some of the above answers.Use our feedback form, or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

Game
Register
Service
Bonus